Sonnet 16

Firstly I imagine mainly that this poem digest be interoperated in two different modalitys. The counterbalance way Is that the writer is in come with a woman that in vulgar manners. The other which is my interpretation is that the writer Pablo Neruda is proclaiming his write out for a certain character by describing it in a unusual way. He compares his love for her to things that people wouldnt commonly compare love to. Such as scenic and equal things. He compares it to un bloomed flowers and dark things. He loves her as if she was one with him, non as if she were an object or prize or nonetheless some other human being. He loves her without knowing how or when or from where. Which way he doesnt love her because of her physical or psychical traits, but because he just does. Secondly, I believe that rhetorical language in this poem helps determine the centre a lot more than if there wasnt any. The spring uses the voice communication as if a lot , meaning he is canvass two different things to create one full global idea. In this text he mentions that I do not love you as if you were a salt-rose or topaz or carnations of arrows the fire shoots off.

Here he is comparing her to scenic and amazing things but then shooting it down and converse that she isnt any of those things. If I were to only read the first paragraph of the text I would think that he doesnt really love her. But as the text grows you pioneer to believe that he does truly love her in an domineering manner. In conclusion I believe that the poem is essentially about the authors true love, comp aring her to beautiful things and saying tha! t she isnt any of it then saying that she is loved like a plant that never blooms, in the end this all comes together and really shows how true and compelling love should be. It shouldnt be stereotypical beauty.If you want to get a full essay, tog it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper