The Need for Gun Control

Shortly after dusk, a sixteen-year-old boy stands on the street receding lecture with a friend about what happened at school today between himself and new(prenominal) student. He nonchalantly stands there sipping his Pepsi when e very in totally of a sudden a dour Honda with tinted windows drives up to the corner. The window rolls wipe out, a articulatio calls out, and the boy walks up to the car. He change shape down to peer into the car to imagine who it is when three rounds from a .38 caliber shooting iron rip by dint of his chest and neck. The otherwise boy frantically runs dour into the distance. He stumbles backwards and trips on the curb foundation him and falls to the sidewalk the car speeds off into the depressed alleyway across the street. The new boy struggles to breathe as he coughs up blood. He chokes to death with all(prenominal) effort to breathe. He dies a import or two later. These kinds of events be all too familiar to us and distract us as w e see an enlarge yield of hand gaseous states fall into the men of the young. I am shocked at the draw of these events where innocent children be world hero sandwichned down on the street because of petty weensy line of reasonings everywhere something so minuscule as a pair of shoes, a token type of jacket, or simply effective a misinterpreted look. I look at that much strict hand zep regulations be a must in todays society. Im not formulation that we pass on to prohibitionning side arms, further we project to take legislative measures in battle array to limit the possibility of hand guns falling into the hands or youths. Peter Annin and Tom Morganthau secernate that according to the Fed successionl Bureau of Investigations coherent Crime Report, murders committed by persons on a lower floor the age of eighteen who were arrested jumped from 1,193 in 1985 to 2982 in 1994. 1 This report shows a substantial increase in the number of killings by plenty who ato mic number 18 under the age of eighteen. intimately of these mess be often participants in gangs and involved with drugs. Many of these pile queue that guns are a much easier mode to defeat his or her opponent in a quarrel. This problem is made worse by the increasing availability of guns. Residents of gang-ridden areas are afraid to leave their homes for fear that their children or themselves might fall dupe to a gunshot. I count that many tribe flavor we need tighter conceal everywhere the sale of handguns while many others study that we shouldnt. Many flock say that it is a right to own firearms and handguns in this democracy because it is guaranteed by the sanction amendment of the United States Constitution. The second amendment states, A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a sepa accountd State, the right of the people to stay and relent Arms, shall not be infringed. First of all, very few states today in the U. S. pitch militias beca use we pull in the five branches of the U.S. Military, the Army, Navy, Marines, Airforce, and Coast Guard. The array provides this country with enough support to stick out off any war levying or belligerent state of matters. That is the militarys obligatory place today. thither is no necessity for a state-run military. The U.S. Militarys suggest is to keep this land free. Second, the Bill of Rights was intentional to protect the people from our g all overnment should it fade to tyranny. These justnesss and rights were established in the period of colonial times when monarchies and dictatorships were commonplace in society. Today, theyre unspoiled about non-existent except for subtle hints of them in communist brasss which exist in areas much(prenominal) as the Peoples Republic of China. We have no need to protect ourselves from the possibility of a dictatorial government materializing from our democracy because it is passing unlikely that this would occur. The United N ations, which the United States is a member of, would not allow this because their main function is to stop the spread of communism. We are not living in that era anymore and that is why I recall that guns arent really needed that much by civilians.As I mentioned before, Im not suggesting that we, the people, agreely ban guns. Firearms and handguns still have their recreational purpose in society. For a lot of people, the turn of hunting wild game is an gratifying pastime and tradition that has been passed down through the ages. People have always hunted. From paleolithic man to the Middle Ages and to the present, hunting has and provides us with food even though that said(prenominal) food go off be purchased at the local supermarket. Other activities such as target shooting and enrollment in gun clubs are to a fault enjoyable. They are sports, just like any other sports, that give men and women a sniff out of pride and satisfaction that fulfills the primitive understanding of competition in our minds.Another important argument among civilians of the country is that if more restrictions on firearms and handguns are passed, this would gradually lead to a total ban on all guns former(prenominal) in the future. In an article create verbally by Robert J. Blen usurp, John T. Young, and David Hemenway, they include a Gallup/CNN/USA Today poll which shows how gun owners, non-owners, and the nation as a full were surveyed. Sixty-five part of all people, including owners of guns and non-owners, believe that stricter decree would gradually lead to a total ban on all guns. In addition, a majority of gun owners, approximately fifty-five per centum, believe that these laws would strip the second amendment of the U. S. Constitution while non-owners don not believe this. The survey was postulation about how stricter laws would reduce certain aspects related to guns. The national figure is sixty-nine percent for those who believe that stricter laws would red uce the number of people killed by guns in arguments. Sixty-eight percent of the nation believe that laws would reduce the number of accidental deaths and suicides attributed to guns. Fifty-eight percent of the nation agrees that more laws would reduce rough crime. However, in both cases of owners and non-owners, the difference of agreement is over twenty percentage points in elevate of non-gun owners. 2 I certainly agree that stricter legislation would definitely reduce the number of gun-related deaths and that if handguns were certified from the hands of minors and criminals, the rate and recidivism rate, the rate of repeat offenders, of violent crime would be reduced. I believe that we need more strict laws to curb some of the violent crime that is being committed by Americas youth. I also believe that the content Rifle Association of America (NRA) pull up stakes not let the government ban all firearms since the NRA is the biggest lobbyist in the gun control debate today bec ause it has so many active members. Finally, most people feel that they need handguns for protection of their property and themselves. I believe that protection of your own property, such as you home, is perfectly fine, but if you take a gun around for protection, that substructure become dangerous. For example, gang members who carry guns are an enormous threat to others. If someone should lecture or annoy them, they might perchance resort to using his or her gun on that person. Innocent children and bystanders could fall victim to a stray bullet. Minor arguments could reveal into bloodshed on the street corner or in a dark alleyway. Other people are also a possible threat, especially to jurisprudence officers. If for some reason, a gun-toting civilian was pulled over for a traffic violation, that person could see to shoot that police officer in an attempt to get away. This would cause major problems in society. Another thing is that people under the influence of drugs or a lcoholic beverage might use their guns on mortal without reason because of impaired reasoning and brain associated with inebriation. Now Im not saying every person would be and is like that, but there are some people that are. I believe that this presents a danger to society and why handgun annoy and sales should be restricted. I believe that we need tougher legislation on handguns. Citizens should be registered for each and every gun he or she owns and that they should be obligated to pay up a high fee for that registration. Also, juveniles and convicted felons that have already served time should not be permitted to purchase or possess and handgun. I believe that if someone who has purchased a handgun, should be required by federal law to take a safety and preparedness course in order to legitimately possess a handgun. This course would be directed by the federal government and would ensure that a handgun purchasers write down would be checked out. This country should have tougher laws in order to restrict handgun access and sale. Im not saying this give work, but it will be a step forward in the teaching of effective gun control. If we and the government earth-closet work together on it, we can slowly minimize the problem and keep guns out of the wrong hands.Bibliography1 Annin, Peter Morganthau, Tom. The relieve before the storm? Newsweek 4 declination 19952 Blendon, Robert J. Hemenway, David Young, John T. The American public and the gun control debate The Journal of the American Medical Association 12 June 19963 historical Perspectivehttp//essaylab.com/blog/gun-control