The Drugging of our Children

Dr. pack Schaller of the Medical College of Pennsylvania (Life Script James Louis Schaller, MD) believes that one must endure everything out first and then see the actual problem before con placering edication. It is familiar in this day and age for deal to acc manipulation the active child of t successor p arnts not have it awaying how to raise or control them. Dr. Michael D. Fraser states that parenting trend is not a cause of ADD and ADHD but that its genetic and can even prepare to do with things like low redeem weight, diet, and allergies.Needleman stated that, It has in any case been claimed that exposure to lead can cause derelict behavior in children. The number one symptom of ADD or ADHD is Often fidgets with hands or feet or squirms in after part, stated by Peter Breggin, MD. Null only gets facts and stories from people that have been negatively affected by the use of psychotropic medications and doctors that are against the use of them. The consultation is o nly able to wrap the mind around sad situations thatll lead to agreement with the argument presented.It was observed that as children got older, school shootings became much common. The cause of this was claimed to be that into this answering their own questions like Werent guns easy to get to in the 1950s and 1960s? In fact, yes, it was Just as easy, if not easier for children to get heir hands on guns then also. Physicians looked further into the children committing these acts. Miguel Humara, Ph. D states that, The most strong form of treatment for ADD and ADHD are cognitive behavioral therapy, and psychotropic medication.All of the children featured in the film had a memoir of being on some sort of psychotropic medication, the most common being Ritalin. These drugs are most commonly meant for people ages eighteen historic period or older, but doctors were being lazy and Just prescribing these drugs to small children also. compare an eighteen ear old on Ritalin to a sept et year old on it, they had different side effects. While the eighteen year old was experiencing headache and vomiting, the seven year old was excited and unconsciously doing violent acts.Obvious to viewers that these had long term consequences to younger aged children. This information sack ups sense and is valid from people with first-hand experience, but what about the people with no horrendous side effects? What about the doctors that do radiation pattern out everything before trying out medicine? These things should have also been addressed by means ofout the film for accurate accusation. The argument is strong and makes the audience think about medicating young children and is definitely persuasive in making them agree.This argument makes the audience think more in depth of the side effects of medication on young children in both their nearsighted term and long term effects. Null, throughout the entire film, speaks to the audience through the credibility of doctors, educa tors, and parents that have lived through experiences. This is an effective way to grab the solicitude of the audience with real life stories of victims. It makes the audience feel as if they know the victim and can have sympathy or their experience and thus be able to agree with the argument, making the argument effective.In reality, young children are going to be a bit hyper and squirmy in their childhood and shouldnt be look at as diseased or troubled. They need while to grow up and understand acceptable behavior. Though teachers and parents quickly make the assumption that there is something wrong, doctors need to be the ones to make the ultimate decision. Therefore, medicine of young children is the result of self- diagnoses, teacher diagnoses, and lack of medical attention and occupy for those with ADD and ADHD.